Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
Ph.D. Student in Geography and Urban Planning, Tehran University
Abstract
According to the chaos theory, there is a pattern of order within disorder and chaos. The city also acts as a complex and chaotic system that will try to achieve a new order with the arrival of disorder. "Covid-19 phenomenon" can also be considered as a chaos, disorder and shock on human civilization and creating an alien and unfamiliar situation in cities. In order to deal with this new and unusual virus, the conventional and existing methods of governance and management in our cities will not work, and a new urban order (smart governance) and new and targeted methods of management and governance should be examined and selected. The existing chaos and disorder should be moved towards self-order, self-organization, sustainable and reasonable development and excellence in the future. In the present study, to examine and identify the indicators and sub-indicators involved in the new urban order or smart urban governance and prioritize their role in reducing the harmful effects of Corona and its impact on progress, sustainable development and excellence in the city of Semnan with a confirmatory factor analysis model and SEM modeling is done with AMOS. It is also possible to turn "smart citizens" into a big opportunity in the post-corona era, along with smart urban infrastructure. After identifying and prioritizing the indicators and sub-indicators involved in this new urban order, a sample of 22 people including elites and experts in various fields of urban planning and smart city, urban planning and urban management was selected. A number of 38 questionnaires were also distributed among the residents of Semnan in order to confirm the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. Then, based on the sample size, the main questionnaire was delivered to 721 people. After analyzing the questionnaires, the smart governance variables were examined and prioritized using exploratory factor analysis in statistical software. Then, the extracted components were named and in the next step, the structural validity of the research was tested using confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS. The statistical relationship between the variables and its indicators was confirmed. In the final model of the research, using model fit tests, the relationships between variables and the influence of independent and dependent variables were confirmed. Based on the results, "smart citizens and smart infrastructure" will be the most important and influential variable of smart governance in Semnan city. The next positions will be for smart economy, smart life, smart mobility and smart environment, respectively. The findings indicate that the importance of the smart citizen index with 32.239% of explained variance is more significant than other factors. "Smart Citizens of Semnan" will be the first factor to achieving smart governance in Semnan. Making citizens smarter requires education, infrastructure and targeted planning. To achieve intelligent governance, people must be educated. By raising awareness, building culture, and creating infrastructures and encouraging citizens to use services and know modern technologies, it will cause sustainable and reasonable development and excellence of the city.
Keywords
پوراحمد، احمد، زیاری، کرامت‌الله، حاتمی‌نژاد، حسین و پارسا (پشاه آبادی)، شهرام (1397). شهر هوشمند: تبیین ضرورت‌ها و الزامات شهر تهران برای هوشمندی. نشریه نگرش‌های نو در جغرافیای انسانی ، 2(38)،8-24.
احمدی، سیروس، حیدری، آرمان و زارعی، محبوبه(1395). تحلیل جامعه‌شناختی رابطه اعتماد اجتماعی و تحقق شهروند الکترونیک در شهر یاسوج. فصلنامه مطالعات جامعه شناختی شهری، 6(20)، 68-49.
بابانسب، رسول و ضرابی، اصغر(1393). تحلیلی بر شاخص‌های شهروند الکترونیکی از نظر شهروندان در شهر تبریز. فصلنامه مطالعات شهری، 4(13)، 70-57.
بیگلو، حسین هادی، سرور، رحیم و نوری، علی(1397).تبیین تحقق پذیری حکمروایی خوب شهری با تاکید بر هوشمندسازی مکان؛ موردکاوی شهر تهران. نشریه مدیریت شهری، 17(52)، 189-204.
حنفی‌زاده، پیام، رحمانی، آرزو و خدمتگزار، حمیدرضا(1390). روش‌های تحقیق ساختارهای چند بعدی. تهران: انتشارات ترمه.
رضوی، سارا و دهقانی‌زاده، نرجس(1389).مقاله تئوری آشوب، تئوری بی‌نظمی. دومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی پژوهش‌های نوین در مدیریت، اقتصاد و علوم انسانی
روستایی، شهریور، پورمحمدی، محمدرضا و قنبری، حکیمه(1397). تئوری شهر هوشمند و ارزیابی مؤلفه‌های زیر ساختی آن در مدیریت شهری، مورد شناسی: شهرداری تبریز. فصلنامه جغرافیا و آمایش شهری منطقه‌ای ، 8(26)، 216-197.
زاهدی، شمس السادات و یعقوبی، نورمحمد(1383). بازآفرینی دولت در عصر اطلاعات. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت صنعتی،206، 45-64.
سجادی، ژیلا و آقایی، پرویز(1395). ارزیابی مؤلفه‌های شهروند هوشمند در فضاهای شهری با رویکرد انتقادی بر نظریه رشد هوشمند شهری، مطالعه موردی: محله ولنجک، منطقه1 شهر تهران. فصلنامه مطالعات مدیریت شهری، 8(25)، 40-49.
فتحی، کوروش و ذهبیون، شهلا(1388). شهروند الکترونیک. نشریه مدارس کارآمد، 9، 24-31.
فلاح، مسعود و استقلال، احمد(1393). مروری بر مفاهیم، شاخص‌ها و معیارهای شهر هوشمند. نشریه شهر هوشمند، 1(1)، 10-1.
قربانی، رسول و نوشاد، سمیه(1387). راهبرد رشد هوشمند در توسعه شهری اصول و راهکارها. فصلنامه جغرافیا و توسعه، 6(12)، 180 -163.
امین‌نژاد، کاوه، غفاری‌گیلانده، عطا، یزدانی، محمدحسن و محمدی، علیرضا(1399). تحلیل بسترها و موانع تحقق حکمروایی هوشمند، مطالعه موردی: شهر سنندج. نشریه مطالعات برنامه‌ریزی سکونتگاه‌های انسانی، 15(3)،841-856.
ابراهیمی، ابوالفضل، محمددوست، محمد، عصاری، فرزانه، لچینانی، علیرضا، امیرپور، نسترن، مرادی، فریده، پورجعفرآبکناری، صدیقه، میرزایی، افسانه، بشردوست، امید، خسروی، فریبا، آقاجانی، زهرا و ترابی، فرنگیس(1400). پیامدها و چالش‌های بحران کرونا در مدیریت شهری. ناشران: فرهیختگان دانشگاه تهران، مرکز مطالعات و برنامه‌ریزی شهر تهران (شهرداری تهران).
الوانی، سیدمهدی و دانایی‌فرد، حسن(1381). تئوری نظم در بی نظمی و مدیریت. تهران: انتشارات صفار.
هاشمی، سیدعلی، راه نجات، میترا و شریف‌زاده‌فتاح، سعدی محمدرضا(1399). نسبتسنجی حکمروایی خوب و شهر هوشمند، مطالعه موردی: شهر تهران. نشریه راهبرد اجتماعی فرهنگی، 9(34)، 90-67.
هومن، حیدرعلی(1384). مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
یعقوبی، نورمحمد و شاکری، رویا(1387). مقایسه تحلیلی مدل‌های پذیرش فناوری با تأکید بر پذیرش بانکداری اینترنتی. فصلنامه علوم مدیریت ایران، 3(11)، 44-21.
Arroub, A., Zahi, B., Sabir, E., & Sadik, M. (2016, October). A literature review on Smart Cities: Paradigms, opportunities and open problems. In 2016 International Conference.on Wireless Networks and Mobile Communications (WINCOM) (pp. 180-186). IEEE
Harrison, C., Eckman, B., Hamilton, R., Hartswick, P., Kalagnanam, J., Paraszczak, J., & Williams, P. (2010). Foundations for Smarter Cities. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 54.
Monzon, A. (2015, May). Smart cities concept and challenges: Bases for the assessment of smart city projects. In 2015 international conference on smart cities and green ICT. systems (SMARTGREENS) (pp. 1-11). IEEE
Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011, June). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In Proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 282-291)
- S., & Vijayan, S. (2013). Quality of Experienced based Approach for Power Scheduling in Smart Grids. Life Science Journal, 10(2.)
Berchin, I. I., & de Andrade, J. B. S. O. (2020). GAIA 3.0: Effects of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak on sustainable development and future perspectives. Research in Globalization, 2, 100014.
Chohan, U. W. (2020). Forecasting the Economic Impact of Coronavirus on Developing Countries: Case of Pakistan.
De Vries, C. E., Bakker, B. N., Hobolt, S., & Arceneaux, K. (2020). Crisis Signaling: How Italy's Coronavirus Lockdown Affected Incumbent Support in Other European Countries. Available at SSRN 3606149.
Fernandes, N. (2020). Economic effects of coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19) on the world economy. Available at SSRN 3557504.
Fetzer, T., Hensel, L., Hermle, J., & Roth, C. (2020). Coronavirus perceptions and economic anxiety. Review of Economics and Statistics,1-36
Hua, J., & Shaw, R. (2020). Corona virus (Covid-19) “infodemic” and emerging issues through a data lens: The case of china. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(7), 2309.
Karabag, S. F. (2020). An unprecedented global crisis! the global, regional, national, political, economic and commercial impact of the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Applied Economics and Business Research, 10(1), 1-6.
Lucchese, M., & Pianta, M. (2020). The Coming Coronavirus Crisis: What Can We Learn? Intereconomics, 55, 98-104.
Lancastle, N. M. (2020). Is the impact of social distancing on coronavirus growth rates effective across different settings? A non-parametric and local regression approach to test and compare the growth rate. medRxiv.
Muzakki, F. (2020). The Global Political Economy Impact of Covid-19 and The Implication to Indonesia. Journal of Social Political Sciences, 1(2), 76-92
Nicola, M., Alsafi, Z., Sohrabi, C., Kerwan, A., Al-Jabir, A., Iosifidis, C., ... & Agha, R. (2020). The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. International journal of surgery (London, England), 78, 185.
Volpert, V., Banerjee, M., d’Onofrio, A., Lipniacki, T., Petrovskii, S., & Tran, V. C. (2020). Coronavirus–Scientific insights and societal aspects.
Zimmermann, K. F., Karabulut, G., Huseyin Bilgin, M., & Cansin Doker, A. (2020). Inter‐country Distancing, Globalization and the Coronavirus Pandemic. The World Economy.
Wells, C. R., Sah, P., Moghadas, S. M., Pandey, A., Shoukat, A., Wang, Y., ... & Galvani, A. P. (2020). Impact of international travel and border control measures on the global spread of the novel 2019 coronavirus outbreak. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(13), 7504-7509.
Viens, A. M., & Eyawo, O. (2020). COVID-19: the rude awakening for the political elite in low-and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health, 5(5), e002807.
Volpert, V., Banerjee, M., d’Onofrio, A., Lipniacki, T., Petrovskii, S., & Tran, V. C. (2020). Coronavirus–Scientific insights and societal aspects.
Baraldi, C., & Cockburn, T. (2018). Introduction: Lived Citizenship, Rights and Participation in Europe. In Theorising Childhood (pp. 1- 27).
Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. ContemporaryCapra, C. F. (2016). The Smart City and its ci t izens: Governance and ci t izen participation in Ci ty. International Journal of EPlanning Amsterdam Smart Research (IJEPR), 5(1), 20-38.
Cegarra-Navarro, J. G., Pachón, J. R. C., & Cegarra, J. L. M. (2012). E-government and citizen's affairs through e-websites: The case of
engagement with local Spanish municipalities. International Journal of Information Management, 32(5), 469-478.
Christopoulou, S. C. (2013). A smart citizen healthcare assistant framework. Health and Technology, 3(3), 249-265.
Clark, K. M., Wen, F., Choi, S., & Hu, H. H. (2013). Smart Growth, Environmental Justice, and Southern California: Case Study in
Projected Cancer Risk in Regional Planning and Health (No. 13- 5324).
Cohen, B. (2015). The smartest cities in thewor ld 2015: Methodology. Fast Company. Recuperado de: http://www. fastcoexist. com/3038818/the-smartestcities- in-the-world-2015-methodology.
Cox, C., & García, C. (2017). Evolution of Citizenship Education in Chile. In Civics and Citizenship (pp. 85-103). Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
Dagnino, E. (2018). Culture, citizenship, and democracy: Changing discourses and practices of the Latin American left. In Cultures of Politics/Politics of Cultures (pp. 33-63). Routledge.
Dameri, R. P., & Ricciardi, F. (2015). Smart city intellectual capital: an emerging view of territorial systems innovation management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(4), 860-887.
de Waal, M., & Dignum, M. (2017). The citizen in the smart city. How the smart city could transform citizenship? it- Information Technology, 59(6), 263-273.
Edwards, M. M., & Haines, A. (2007). Evaluating smart growth: Implications for small communities. Journal of
Planning Education and Research, 27(1), 49-64.Estabrook, R., & Neale, M. (2013). A comparison of factor score estimation methods in the presence of missing data: Reliability and an application to nicotine dependence. Multivariate behavioral research, 48(1), 1-27.
Giddens, A. (2000). Citizenship education in the global era. Tomorrow’s citizens, 19-25. Hemment, D., & Townsend, A. (2013). Smart citizens. Manchester: FutureEverything Publication. Accessed June, 8, 2015.
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & Van de Schoot, R. (2017). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Routledge.
Hu, M. C. (2014). Antecedents for the adoption of new technology in emerging wireless cities: Comparisons between singapore and taipei. Regional Studies, 48(4), 665-679.
Keat ing, A., & Janmaat, J. G. (2015). Education through citizenship at school: Do school activities have a lasting impact on youth political engagement? Parliamentary Affairs, 69(2), 409-429.
Litman, T. (2003). Evaluating criticism of smart growth. Vicoria, BC: Victoria Transport Policy Institute.
McDonald, R. P. (2014). Factor analysis and related methods. Psychology Press.
Steenkamp, J. B. E., & Van Trijp, H. C. (1991). The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in marketing, 8(4), 283-299.
Baba Nasab, R., Zarabi, A. (2015). An Analysis of Citizen Indicators from View oF Citizens in Tabriz. Journal of Urban Studies, 4(13),57-70. (In Persian)
)