In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Geography and Urban Planning Association

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 department of urban development, science and research branch, Islamic Azad university, Tehran, Iran.

2 department of urban development,since and research branch, Islamic Azad university, tehran, iran

3 University of Tehran

4 Faculty of Architecture and Urban Development, University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

In 2018, about fifty-five percent of the world's population lived in urban areas and is projected to increase to sixty-eight percent by 2050. The increasing population of cities emphasizes the optimal use of urban neighborhoods for housing. Urban morphology is one of the topics related to the population of neighborhoods. The purpose of this study is to identify morphological indices in the middle scale and explain the relationship between morphology of residential areas and the population living in them. First, based on the internal-cognitive approach, the opinions of thinkers in the field of morphology were examined and the criteria of "land use diversity", "road network pattern", "compaction" and "public transportation network pattern" were identified in 9 indicators on a local scale. Then, the indicators were measured by space layout and network analysis by Depthmap10 and GIS software in 12 neighborhoods of Tehran. In the next step, first the normality of the data was checked by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test method and the correlation of morphological variables with the population index of the neighborhoods was evaluated by Pearson two-way correlation method and SPSS16 software. The results show that the interconnection index with an intensity of 0.724 has the highest correlation and access to public transportation with an intensity of 0.578 has the lowest correlation with the population index. Examining the severity of correlations provides an opportunity for better prioritization to intervene in the existing fabric of neighborhoods with the aim of resettling the population. The results can be used in the field of evaluation criteria for residential design options, selection of road network and quantitative and qualitative assessment of preparation plans in order to accommodate more population and setting the criteria for detailed plans.

Keywords

پور­محمدی، محمدرضا، صدرموسوی، میرستار و جمالی، سیروس (1394). ریخت­شناسی شهری: بازنمایی معماری در مقیاس شهر. تبریز: انتشارات فروزش.
کریمی، محمد، طالعی، محمد و جوادی, قاسم (1392). ارزیابی کاربرد شاخص‌های تعیین تنوع در اختلاط کاربری‌های شهری (مطالعه موردی: نواحی و محلات منطقه هفت شهرداری تهران). مطالعات و پژوهش‌های شهری و منطقه‌ای،4 (16). 23-46.
خزاعی­نژاد، فروغ و قرخلو, مهدی (1391). مطالعۀ روند تغییرات سکونت جمعیت در مجموعۀ شهری تهران.فصلنامه جغرافیا و آمایش شهری- منطقه­ای، 2 (3). 47-60.
دانشپور، عبدالهادی و مرادی، سلمان (1391). تبیین روش ریخت-گونه­بندی و کاربرد آن در طراحی شهری. دوفصلنامه نامه معماری و شهرسازی، 5 (9)، 65-89..
زمانی، بهادر و هنرور، محسن (1391). مبانی و معیارهای تکنیک چیدمان فضا، کاربست تطبیقی: محلات دولت­خانه و ملاصدرای شمالی اصفهان. چهارمین کنفرانس برنامه­ریزی و مدیریت شهری، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد و شهرداری مشهد.
شمس، مجید، قمری، مصطفی، عبودی، ادریس و محمدی، کاوه (1390). بررسی مهاجرت­های روستایی و تأثیر آن بر مورفولوژی شهرها (نمونه موردی: شهر سقز). فصلنامه برنامه­ریزی منطقه­ای، 1 (3)، 57-68.
قلعه­نویی، محمود و اسدی، غزال (1392). مطالعه تطبیقی ریخت­شناسی بلوک­ها و قطعات شهری محله جماله اصفهان در سال­های 1355 و 1382. دوفصلنامه مرمت و معماران ایران، 3 (6)، 41-53.
محملی­ابیانه، حمیدرضا (1390). مقایسه تطبیقی مکاتب مطالعات مورفولوژی شهری به منظور تکمیل آن براساس دستگاه تحلیلی مکتب اقتصاد سیاسی فضا. آرمان شهر، 4 (7)، 159-172.
معاونت شهرسازی و معماری شهرداری تهران (1391). ضوابط و مقررات طرح تفصیلی یکپارچه شهر تهران.
میرمقتدایی، مهتا (1385). پیشنهاد روشی برای تحلیل شخصیت شهر. مجله محیط شناسی، 32 (39)، 129 – 140.
همدانی­گلشن، حامد (1395). وجوه شکل شهر. مجله منظر، 5 (24)، 142-149.
Bekkering, H. C. (2006). Morphological Analysis of the Contemporary Urban Territory: Is It Still a Relevant Approach? In F. Hoeven van der, & H. J. Rosemann (Eds.), Urban Transformations and Sustainability, 96-113.
Cataldi, G., Maffei, G. & Vaccaro, P. (2002). Saverio Muratori and the Italian school of planning typology. Urban Morphology, 6, 3-14.
 Clifton, k., Ewing, R., Knaap, G & Song, Y. (2008). Quantitative analysis of urban form: a multidisciplinary review, Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1, 17-45.
Comert, N. Z. (2013). Testing an Integrated Methodology for Urban Typo-morphology Analysis on Famagusta and Ludlow, PhD degree in architecture. Eastern Mediterranean University, Gazimagusa, North Cyprus.
Conzen, M. R. G. (1960), Alnwick: A Study in Town Plan Analysis, Transactions, Institute of British Geographers, 27, 1-122.
Ford, A. C., Barr, S. L., Dawson, R. J., and James, P. (2015). Transport Accessibility Analysis Using GIS: Assessing Sustainable Transport in London. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf.  4, 124-149.
Gauthier, P. & Gilliland, J. (2006). Mapping Urban Morphology: A Classification Scheme for Interpreting Contributions to the Study of Urban Form. Urban morphology, 10(1), 41-50.
Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine (Electronic edition), Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
Kropf, K. (1996), Urban tissue and the character of town. Urban Design International, 1(3), 274-263.
Moudon, A. V. (1997). Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. International seminar on urban Form, urban morphology, (1),  3-10.
Moudon, A. V. (1998). The Changing Morphology of Suburban Neighborhoods. In Typological Process and Design Theory. Attilio Petruccioli (ed). Cambridge, Massachusetts: Aga Khan Program for Islamic Architecture, 141 – 157.
Oliveira, V. (2016). Urban morphology an introduction to the study of the physical form of cities. Springer.
Schirmer, P. & Axhausen, K. (2016). A multiscale classification of urban morphology. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 9, 101-130.
Shi, Z., A. F. Jimeno & A. Schlueter. (2017). A review of simulation-based urban form generation and optimization for energy-driven urban design. ELSEVIER. Building and Environment, 121, 119-129.
Tsirigotia, D. & Bikasa, D. (2017). A Cross Scale Analysis of the Relationship between Energy Efficiency and Urban Morphology in the Greek City Context. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 38, 682-687.
www. tehran.ir