In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Geography and Urban Planning Association

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. student in urban planning, Tarbiat modares University

2 Associate Professor urban planning, Tarbiat modares University

Abstract

The formation of approaches with the attitude of advocacy planning can be related to the existence and continuity of spatial and socioeconomic inequality and the conventional failures of planning. In Iran, planners who work as urban planning engineers in most of the consulting engineer’s companies, or in person, can use their expertise to encourage citizens to follow their legal rights and to increase their social participation. Examples can be found in plans that are intended to change the land use through the Organization of the Engineering System to eligible city planners. The purpose of the present study is to review the literature of advocacy planning and its application to urban land use adaptation plans. It also tries to show the relations between land use adaptation plans and advocacy planning theory in terms of topics, methods, and goals (the relation between theory and practice). The methodology of the present research is qualitative and data were collected through deep interviewing techniques and nonreactive measures (archival records). The field theory approach has been adopted to analyze the information and to present the final theory. Based on the qualitative sampling method of the typical case study and the theoretical saturation criterion, the views of thirty-five experts in the field of urbanization have been used in this study and their perception of the research questions have been analyzed. Using the "grounded theory" method and data coding, nine core categories were extracted from the initial findings. The result of the present study, with regard to the final core category, indicates that “urban adaptation schemes cover many aspects of advocacy theory in urban planning, and can be considered as a practical dimension in many aspects of Advocacy Planning Theory”. The findings reveal the deep relationship between the theory of planning advocacy and urban land use adaptation plans.

Keywords

اجلالی، پرویز؛ مجتبی رفیعیان؛ علی عسگری (1391). نظریۀ برنامه‌ریزی: دیدگاه‌های سنتی و جدید، نشر آگه، تهران.
عبدی دانشپور، زهره (1387 ): درآمدی بر نظریه های برنامه ریزی با تأکید ویژه بر برنامه ریزی شهری، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه شهید بهشتی
رفیعیان، مجتبی؛ نریمان، جهانزاد(۱۳۹۴): دگرگونی اندیشه در نظریه برنامه‌ریزی، انتشارات آرمانشهر
محمد پور ، احمد ( 1388) : روش تحقیق کیفی(ضد روش) انتشارات جامعه شناسان، تهران
 مشهودی، سهراب(1380) :مبانی طرحهای سیال شهری ، شرکت پردازش وبرنامه ریزی شهری: تهران
مصوبات گروه تخصصی سازمان نظام مهندسی استان گیلان (1395) : شرح خدمات طرح های انطباق کاربری اراضی شهری و انطباق شهری
همائی‌فر، علی؛ سحر بهروش(1392): طرح انطباق کاربری اراضی شهری و انطباق شهری ساختمان ها، الگویی برای کنترل تغییرات توسعه شهری ، ماهنامه طاق، شماره 75-78،مشهد
 Alexander, E.R.(2013) :values in planning and design : A process perspective on ethics in forming the built environment, in Claudia Basta and Stefano Moroni (editors) Ethics , Design and planning of  the built environment.,springer
Allmendinger. P. (2002).PlanningTheory, Houndsmills, Palgrave.
Angotti,Tom,2010,” Advocacy and Community Planning: Past, Present and Future”, planners
network: the organization of progressive planning.
Anguelovski I, Shi L, Chu E, (2016) Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation: Critical perspectives from the global north and south. Journal of Planning Education and Research 36(3): 333–348
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008): Basics of qualitative research: Techniques to developing grounded theory (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage
Chu Eric, Anguelovski Isabelle, Carmin JoAnn. 2016. “Inclusive Approaches to Urban Climate Adaptation Planning and Implementation in the Global South.” Climate Policy
Davidoff, P. (1965) : Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31 (4), 331–338.
Davidoff, P., and T. A. Reiner. 1962. A choice theory of planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners
Embankment, Albert,2001,” Advocacy; What’s it all about?”, WaterAid, Prince Consort House,London, November 2001
Glaser, Barney G. and Strauss, Anselm L. (1967) : The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago.: Aldine
Flyvbjerg,B. (1998): Rationality and Power:Democracy in practice. Chicago,University of Chicago Press
Harwood,stacy anne,2003,” Environmental Justice on the Streets: Advocacy Planning as a Tool to Contest Environmental Racism”, sage publication, Journal of Planning Education and Research
Hoch, Charles,1994, “What Planners Do”, Power, Politics, and Persuasion, IL: American Planning Association,Chicago.
Lane, M. B. (2005): Public Participation in Planning: An Intellectual History. Australian Geographer , 36 (3), 283–299
Mazziotti, D. F. (1982): The underlying assumptions of advocacy planning: pluralism and reform. In C. Paris (Ed.), Critical readings in planning theory (pp. 207–227). New York: Pergamon Press).
Marris, P. (1994). "Advocacy planning as a bridge between the professional and the political", APA Journal, Spring.
Paris,C.(ed). (1982). Critical Readings in Planning Theory, London. Permagon Press
Preston BL, Westaway RM, Yuen EJ (2011) Climate adaptation planning in practice: An evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 16(4): 407–43
Piven,F.F. (1970). "Whom does the advocacy planner serve?" Social Policy, vol.1, May, June