In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Geography and Urban Planning Association

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 2. PhD student of Islamic Architecture, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of architecture, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.

3 4. Assistant Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran

4 Professor, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran

10.30473/psp.2026.77806.2809

Abstract

Introduction                               
Designing desirable housing requires accurate knowledge of users and understanding the changes in their needs in social and cultural contexts. One of the effective factors in this field is intergenerational differences that affect the formation of spatial and physical preferences of residents. The aim of this research is to explain the physical preferences of architecture in the field of housing, focusing on the role of intergenerational differences in Urmia city.
Methodology
This study is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in nature and was conducted with a quantitative approach. Data were collected through library studies and field surveys, and the main tool was a researcher-made questionnaire whose validity was confirmed by experts and its reliability was established with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.902. The statistical population includes four generations of Urmia residents (the growing generation, Generation X, Generation Millennial, and Generation Z). The sample size was 384 people who were selected using the stratified-cluster sampling method. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software and ANOVA, ANCOVA, and multivariate regression tests.
Results
The findings show that the internal consistency of the items is favorable and there is a significant difference between generations in physical housing preferences (F=18.74, p<0.01). These differences are especially prominent in the physical-functional and physical-environmental dimensions. Younger generations have a greater tendency towards spatial flexibility, multiple functions, and smartization, and older generations emphasize spatial hierarchy, privacy, and functional separation.
Discussion and Conclusion
The results also show that the generation variable still has a significant effect on physical housing preferences even after controlling for socio-economic factors and was identified as the strongest predictor of physical preferences

Keywords

Abbasi, M., & Seddigh, M. (2020). Designing the parental home with an approach to increasing intergenerational communication with physical components (Master’s thesis). University of Science and Culture. [In Persian]
Aghalatifi, A. (2012). The pattern of interaction between humans and contemporary homes in Iran (Ph.D. dissertation). University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Azad Armaki, T. (2007). Generational change process: A meta-analysis in Iran. Youth and Generational Relations. 1, 41-68. [In Persian]
Bachelard, G. (1958). The poetics of space. Beacon Press.
Behzadfar, M., & Ghazi Zadeh, N. (2011). Satisfaction with residential open space – Case study: Residential complexes in Tehran. Journal of Fine Arts, Architecture and Urbanism, 16(1), 15-24. [In Persian]. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22286020.1390.3.45.2.4
Boyce, R. R. (1990). The bases of economic geography: An essay on urban and regional development. Routledge.
Coolen, H., & Hoekstra, J. (2001). Values as determinants of preferences for housing attributes. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16(3/4), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011393412255
Dehkhoda, A. A. (1956). Loghatnameh Dehkhoda. 1st ed., edited by G. H. Memarian, I. Mehraki, & A. Soltani. University of Tehran. [In Persian]
Dua, M. (2024). The future of housing: Trends and innovations. Urban Planning Today, 15(2), 45-62.
Ebrahimi, S., & Islami, S. Gh.  (2010). Iranian Urbanism and Architecture during Transmission Period. Hoviatshahr, 4(6), 3-14. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/2.189.160.148/fa/article/488058/
Haeri Mazandarani, M. R. (2009). Home, culture, nature in Iranian architecture. Center for Urbanism and Architecture Studies and Research.
Henilane, I. (2016). Housing concept and analysis of housing classification. Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, 4(1), 168- 179.
Heshmati, S., & Charejou, F. (2018). The impact of environmental qualities on perceived resident security, with an emphasis on CPTED first and second generation components (Case study: Dilapidated fabric neighborhoods of Sanandaj). Strategic Studies of Social Issues, 7 (3), 83-100. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22108/ssoss.2019.115637.1377
Ismail, H., & Shaari, S. M. (2020). The location, house, or neighbourhood choice preferences among Malaysian housing generations. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 35(4), 987-1005.
Ismail, H., Nordin, M. S. A., & Abidin, A. W. Z. (2020). The elderly-friendly housing design features preferences by generations in Malaysia. International Journal of Architectural Research, 14(3), 210-225.
Jabbour, C. (2021). Living together: The architecture and mutual symbiosis of intergenerational housing. Journal of Urban Design, 26(5), 567-583.
Jain, S., & Nayak, A. V. (2024). Millennial needs and aspirations for emerging housing typologies. Built Environment Journal, 40(1), 33-49.
Kim, J. J. (2007). Impact of globalization on the US-Mexico border: Case study of grassroots activism for the migrant and refugee community (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park). ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Kopeva Matveieva, O. M., Ivanova, O., & Khrapko, O. (2021). Architectural typology of intergenerational shared sites. Architecture and Engineering, 8(2), 78-90.
Mannheim, K. (1952). The problem of generations. In K. Mannheim, Essays on the sociology of knowledge (pp. 276-330). Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Original work published 1923).
Miller, D. J. (2014). Intergenerational housing: A vernacular perspective (Master’s thesis, The Pennsylvania State University). ETDA. https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/21811
Moein, M. (1983). Moein Persian Dictionary. Amirkabir Publications. [In Persian]
Mohammadpour, P., Nourtaghani, A., & Ebrahimi, A. (2024). Family Characteristics and Housing Spatial Configurations: A Study of Intergenerational Changes in Northern Iran. Journal of Family Studies, 30(3), 189-205
Nayak, S. P., Dash, S. P., Amin, P. S., & Priyashantha, K. G. (2023). A review on intergenerational cohousing: a possible living option for elderly and youth. C, 7(3), 535-556.
Norberg-Schulz, Ch. (1985). The Concept of Dwelling, Electa/Rizzoli.
Norouzi, N., Swenson, A., & Harvey, S. (2022). Designing for success: Integrating theories of human development into architectural design for intergenerational programming. Journal of Architectural Education, 76.
Parhizkar, A., & Inanloo, A. (2002). Residential applications and their economic-social importance (Urban areas of Iran). Journal of Geography Education Growth, 15(62), 9-15. [In Persian]
Pirnia, M. K. (1999). Research in the past architecture of Iran. G. H. Memarian, editor, Iran University of Science and Technology. [In Persian]
Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow and Company.
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today’s super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy–and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books.
Vrkljan, Brenda, W., Amanda, K., Tara, N.,Shaarujaa, P.J. & White, L. H. (2019). Creating an intergenerational university hub: Engaging older and younger users in the shaping of space and place. Behavioral Sciences, 9(3), 31.
Yanarateş Baş, D., & Karagözler, D. (2021). Prefabrication and new generation housing design criteria in interior architecture. 7th International E-Conference on New Trends in Architecture and Interior Design, 34.
Ziyari, K.A., Arvin, M., & Bazrafkan, S. (2018). Investigating the impact of social capital on the realization of a healthy city (Case study: Bandar Mahshahr). Urban Sociological Studies (Urban Studies), 9(29), 138-170. [In Persian]
Zuhdi, F., Saptorini, R., & Hastuti, H. (2020). Millennial and Gen Z preferences for their co-living. Journal of Residential Architecture, 8(3), 150-165.