In collaboration with Payame Noor University and Iranian Geography and Urban Planning Association

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Faculty of Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Master of urban planning, Faculty of Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

3 Ph.D. Student of urbanism, Faculty of Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Master of urban planning, Faculty of Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

10.30473/psp.2023.62098.2556

Abstract

If the development of the local economy relies on the improvement of competitive local enterprises, it will attract domestic investment, improve human capital, increase work skills, improve local infrastructure and balanced economic development in the localities. Creativity as a foundation can cause economic growth and development in many contemporary societies. As a cultural and commercial source, creative industries are the most powerful part of the economy, and their use in planning areas leads to the development of the local economy and, consequently, the development of the national economy. The creative city will also lead to economic growth and development by having creative industries and attracting creative forces. Farahzad neighborhood has the ability to adopt the creative city approach in strengthening the local economy in order to improve the employment situation and empower people for two reasons: one is that it has suitable ecological resources and active institutions, and the second is that it suffers from unfavorable socio-economic conditions and the existence of informal jobs. This research has been done in three stages to achieve its goals. In the first step, by reviewing the theoretical literature, the dimensions of talent, technology, tolerance, land property and urban participation were determined. In the second stage, areas with planning priority based on existing spatial, social and physical commonalities include; low security, inadequate access and roads, existence of environmental problems, lack of ownership documents, low level of social interactions in the area, economic problems, poor condition of housing and existence of cultural differences between different ethnic groups were identified. In the last step, the criteria in the eligible planning areas were evaluated through interviews. Then, by analyzing the interviews through the MAXQDA software, the role of the components in the development of the local economy of Farahzad has been identified. Therefore, each of the examined dimensions was considered as follows: the dimension of land assets with seven components include; historical background, role of tourism, religion, traditional gardens, Farahzad river, restaurants and mountain section; the technology dimension with the component of having mobile internet; talent dimension with four components i.e., Possession of cultural institutions, residents' skills, desire to learn skills and desire for education, and urban participation dimension with three components; enjoying the diversity of different ethnic groups, following up on existing problems and participating in construction projects.

Keywords

خبرگزاری بازتاب (1398). دره فرحزاد اکوپارک می­شود. دسترسی آنلاین: https://baztab.ir/658589/.
دانایی‌فرد، حسن و کاظمی، حسین (1396). پویش کیفی و طرح پژوهش: انتخاب از میان پنج رویکرد (روایت پژوهی، پدیدار شناسی، نظریه داده بنیاد، قوم نگاری و مطالعه موردی). جان کراسول. تهران: انتشارات صفار.
رزاقیان، فرزانه، رهنما، محمدرحیم، توانگر، معصومه و آقاجانی، حسین (1391). تحلیل اکولوژیکی پارک های شهری (مطالعه موردی: مشهد). محیط شناسی، 38(64)، 155-168.
رفیعیان، مجتبی، محمودی، مهران و شایان، سیاوش (1392). برنامه‌ریزی کاربری اراضی در مناطق حساس شهری، مطالعه موردی: روددره فرحزاد-­ تهران. مطالعات و پژوهش­های شهری و منطقه­ای. 5(16)، 64-47.
رفیعیان، محسن، بمانیان، محمدرضا، و رفیعیان، مجتبی(1389). شناسایی پهنه‌های زمینه‌ساز توسعه خلاق بافت‌های فرسوده با رویکرد گردشگری در برنامه‌ریزی شهری، مطالعه موردی: محله امامزاده یحیی, ناحیه2, منطقه 12 شهرداری تهران. مدیریت شهری، 8(25)، 235-257.
سعیدی، هادی (1389) . شهر خلاق .ماهنامه پژوهشی، آموزشی شهرداری ها. 11(100)، 5-11.
شبانی، امیرحسین و ایزدی، محمدسعید (1393). رویکردی نوین به بازآفرینی شهر خلاق. نقش جهان، 4(2)، 54-63.
علاءالدینی، پویا و میرزایی، آمنه (1394). توسعه مشارکت محله فرحزاد تهران به عنوان تفرجگاه و مقصد گردشگری: بستر و موانع. پژوهش انسان شناسی ایران، 5(2)، 251-266.
محمدپور، احمد (1392). روش تحقیق کیفی ضد روش(منطق و طرح در روش شناسی کیفی). تهران: انتشارات جامعه شناسان.
مرکز آمار ایران (1395). سرشماری عمومی فرحزاد. تهران: درگاه ملی آمار ایران.
مرتضوی، فرنوش (1390). بررسی ویژگی­های شهر دانش­بنیان تهران مبتنی بر جذب و نگهداری کارکنان دانشی، پایان­نامه کارشناسی‌ارشد، رشته مدیریت شهری، دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
مهندسین مشاور فرنهاد (1394). بازنگری سند توسعه محله فرحزاد.
نیک‌گهر، عبدالحسین (1392). روش تحقیق در علوم اجتماعی. ریمون کیوی و لوک وان کامپنهود. تهران: انتشاران توتیا.
Ahmad Mohammad, S. (2017). Creative city indicators: A Framework. Master Thesis, Cairo University.
Bartik Timothy, J. (2014). Jobs, productivity and local economis development: What implication does economic research for the role of government. National Tax Journal,47(4). 847-861.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology,3(2), 77-101.
Florida, R. (2003). Cities and the creative class. City & Community, 2(1), 3–19.
Florida, R. (2010). South Korea: Moving into the Creative Age. JoonAng Daily, 19 May, Seoul.
Hahn, J. (2010). Creative Cities and (UN) Sustainability–Cultural Perspectives. Cultura21 eBooks Series on Culture and Sustainability, 3.
Hartley, J. Potts, J. MacDonalds, T. Erukunt, Ch.  & Kufleither. C (2012): The CCI Creative City Index, Cultural Science Journal. 5(1).
International Labour Organization (ILO). (2007). Local Economic Development for Employment Generation, Peace and Security: Approaches, Tools and Good Practices in the Philippines/International Labour Office.
Krippenforf, Klaus. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. encyclopedia of communication. Oxford University Press.
Landry, C., & Bianchini, F. (1995). The creative city. London: Demos.
Landry, C. (2008). The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators (2nd Ed.). Near Stroud: Comedia.
Santos N. (2018). Urban Acupuncture through Creative Villas in Santos City, Brazil. VI International Creative Cities Congress, January 24-25, 939-964.
Sarvar, R. Akbari, M. Amani, M & Taleshi Anbouhi, M. (2016). Efficiency analysis of urban neighborhoods in terms of creative city indicators (Case study: Bonab city). Journal of Geography, 48, 322-351.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research Methods for Business Students. 6 th edition, Pearson Education Limited.
Seungil, Y. (2020): How Can We Measure the Magnitude of Creative Cities? A New Creativity Index: 3Ci, Creativity Research
 Journal
. 32(1), 174-183.
Wilson, D., & Keil, R. (2008). The real creative class. Social & Cultural Geography,
     9(8), 841–847.
Ihani, W., Syofya, H., Leonardo Sari, A., & Gede Mulawarman, W. (2020). The Role of the Creative Industry in Economic Development.  Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 8(1), 268-27.